I love a good benchmark, thanks for putting this together! However, I have a bit of feedback. First, the graph is misleading, stacking times with languages tha

I love a good benchmark, thanks for putting this together! However, I have a bit of feedback. First, the graph is misleading, stacking times with languages that have half the implementation, they appear faster, until you dig in. I'd suggest producing an alternate graph that shows only the implemented puzzles in every language, or make a unique graph for every language:puzzle. Second, the examples are taken from rosetta code and are not necessarily what would be the best implementation, or even close to the best implementation, for benchmarking purposes. Finally, those examples should be reproduced across various hardware platforms, I'm on arm64 Darwin myself, but you might find different results on Intel platforms due to the various compiler optimizations available based on the hardware. More benchmarks would be interesting to see, such as actual real world operations, e.g. opening a file, reading it, parsing json, opening a socket server, etc.