4 ms·
If you actually went through with it, traced over that picture and posted it back to the thread that would be nice, as it seems not everyone can see it as clear
by hytfyiv3j 3y ago
If you actually went through with it, traced over that picture and posted it back to the thread that would be nice, as it seems not everyone can see it as clearly as you can.
Maybe even the original authors would appreciate it.
- wizzwizz4 3y agohttps://0x0.st/H62J.ora https://0x0.st/H62J.ora This is not a permanent link, and it's not my server so please don't hammer it. Well, it turns out I can't mouse-draw, even when I'm tracing, but I've given it a go. It's supposed to be a cat walking from the right to the left of the image. The first layer has a better head, and the second layer has a better front leg and ears. Note that my lines obscure the recognisable features, so you'll have to switch the layer off to see them. I traced dark shapes in the first one, and light shapes in the second. If you compare with the flowers layer, regions I identified as “better” in each trace correspond to amplification of the flowers image: the "good" leg outline in the second (light) layer lines up with the (light) stem of the flower, etc.
- im3w1l 3y agoI took a look and my brain must be wired differently from yours because I don't really see it.