I'm saying that the implied conclusions you read from just the headline, is not what the majority of people in this thread (including me) read. I sincerely doub

I'm saying that the implied conclusions you read from just the headline, is not what the majority of people in this thread (including me) read. I sincerely doubt there's a hidden agenda here. Male suicides are not less important, and not ignored in neither the article nor headline. Perhaps you're looking for some agenda, and perhaps that does exist in other places on the internet (apparently you read things you don't approve on on mastodon?). Whatever conclusions you drew from that, this article and title just doesn't seem like a good example of that and probably the wrong thing to get upset about. In my opinion it's a good article and the title is both accurate and highlights the most significant conclusion.