> Now as the world expects fluent animation and eye candy How so? A lot of websites rely upon animations (I'm guessing you're referring to more advanced CSS s

> Now as the world expects fluent animation and eye candy How so? A lot of websites rely upon animations (I'm guessing you're referring to more advanced CSS support here), yet people still use browsers like w3m, elinks, lynx, etc. If anything, I'd imagine the information density would be much greater with something like Dillo: you'd have much less distracting (as you put it, "eye candy") to draw attention away from the text on the page, which is most certainly welcome IMO.