Haha. This is funny because you're making a slippery slope argument that consists of chastising gp for making a slippery slope argument (which they didn't). GP

Haha. This is funny because you're making a slippery slope argument that consists of chastising gp for making a slippery slope argument (which they didn't). GP was just saying (given their assumptions / understanding) that it's a bad trade-off to allow people to take these particular risks. That the costs outweigh the benefits. You, on the other hand, claim gp's (supposed) slippery slope will lead down the path of banning anything... in other words, that if we ban people from taking [these risks] it creates a slippery slope to arbitrarily banning all kinds of things with any risk involved.