5 ms·
I'm sorry, but there is no universal "scale". Measures of attractiveness vary across time, between cultures, and from person to person. (And can also shift dram
by archagon 3y ago
I'm sorry, but there is no universal "scale". Measures of attractiveness vary across time, between cultures, and from person to person. (And can also shift dramatically depending on how well you know someone.)
For more information, see this video essay: https://youtu.be/X53ZSxkQ3Ho https://youtu.be/X53ZSxkQ3Ho
- talldatethrow 3y agoWhen people hand out overall scores, it's done from a more universal metric. And if not, atleast within your circle. Being too far out of your circle is only going to lower the perceived score. So yes, if Pro Baseball player might sleep with a girl that is an 8 in the Punk Rock club world, but to him she's a 6-7 because he doesn't value that stuff. For a guy, ease raises a girls score temporarily. For a woman, perceived value raises a score temporarily.
- djaro 3y agoIf you asked 100 people, literally everyone would agree Arnold Schwarzenegger is more attractive than Danny Devito. For people in the middle it's a bit more subjective but there are people that are more or less attractive.