I think the both-sides-equal analysis is not only simplistic (and very unlikely), but just serves the far more corrupt side. Yes, we can make endless arguments

I think the both-sides-equal analysis is not only simplistic (and very unlikely), but just serves the far more corrupt side. Yes, we can make endless arguments based on relativism, but I don't think the level of corruption is comparable. For one thing, brazenly corrupt reactionary right figures remain very popular and stay in power - they embrace and flaunt corruption.