3 ms·
Vice mad it can't afford $8 checkmark and algorithmic boosting. Better?
by oaththrowaway 3y ago
Vice mad it can't afford $8 checkmark and algorithmic boosting. Better?
- delecti 3y agoBut that's not accurate either. They've got a business account (gold checkmark), which AFAIK costs even more than $8. https://twitter.com/vice https://twitter.com/vice The problem is that any dumbass can pay $8 and spread algorithmically boosted misinformation. They're using this particular disaster as illustrative of how badly twitter has been ruined as a resource, when it used to be so valuable.
- oaththrowaway 3y agoIt was clearly a joke about Vice's finances. Keep downvoting though
- throwaway167 3y agoJoking about Vice's finances in a story about X.
- oaththrowaway 3y agoWritten by...?