The opposite is true, considering your audience. In order to improve the environment those who can raise newborns with first-world nutrition, care, and educatio

The opposite is true, considering your audience. In order to improve the environment those who can raise newborns with first-world nutrition, care, and education need to have more children. The economic efficiency and technological leaps that come with increasing the number of productive people would mitigate, slow, and potentially reverse climate change much more than surrendering the world to those who refine metals by mixing mercury over burning tires and will continue to reproduce without care for Malthusian handwringing. Note how the US reduced carbon emissions despite an increasing fertile population and concurrent deregulation. While others who focused only on limiting their status quo increased emissions. Human society is dynamic, not static, and linear projections and limits do not play out so simply.