Hey, author here. Yes I can confirm it was editorialized[1] The fact that you're (rightfully) questioning that, is the crux of the issue. Without an editorial

Hey, author here. Yes I can confirm it was editorialized[1] The fact that you're (rightfully) questioning that, is the crux of the issue. Without an editorial note, it causes confusion and suspicion even when neither are warranted. HN might be my favorite agg site on the web. I appreciate that I can read non-corporate blogs on here. So, I don't want to sound like I'm hammering this point too hard. But clearly there's a better way to editorialize? Maybe not. I don't have to make difficult moderation decisions so perhaps it's easy to say what they must change. [1] https://mastodon.social/@fromjason/111677854315632640 https://mastodon.social/@fromjason/111677854315632640