> [citation needed]. GC is undeniably easier to work with, at least at first, and the comment I was responding to was about "inexperienced programmers". No bl

> [citation needed]. GC is undeniably easier to work with, at least at first, and the comment I was responding to was about "inexperienced programmers". No bleeping citation needed because it's my opinion see. I'm not saying that GC is better than linear types (it's not), but apparently the very thought that GC might be easier on "inexperienced programmers" is enough to send HN commenters into a tizzy!