7 ms·
There is already have a blend of exactly what you desire in the US. But to answer your question, in the case of github copilot it does the checking for you, so
by tensor 3y ago
There is already have a blend of exactly what you desire in the US. But to answer your question, in the case of github copilot it does the checking for you, so no you don't need a list of all the sources.
Regarding you wanting to opt-out of training, that's fine you can already do that for many large models. But likely doing that will become the equivalent of putting your works in a safe where no one but you will ever end up reading them or finding them.
Banning all AI training is the equivalent to banning search with any modern search engine.
edit: Also, note that you are already on the hook for not infringing patents, which if you were to try to do "perfectly" like you imply with copyright, then you need to search/read/understand the entire body of published patents. A task that is clearly not possible. Yet patent law functions (unfortunately).
- wredue 3y agoI mean, you’re really just saying that it should be fine for AI to copy stuff and because it’s impossible to verify, nobody can use it. What good is training an AI if nobody can use it? Pretending that disallowing AI is the same as disallowing everyone is a strawman. People finding you is a whole lot different than your work being copied being completely okay so long as it was an AI that did it.