> Not that I disagree exactly, but how do you see the people making the knowledge being rewarded for their work? I don't have the answer. I do know that all of

> Not that I disagree exactly, but how do you see the people making the knowledge being rewarded for their work? I don't have the answer. I do know that all of society would need to change. The simple approach would be that they are provided food and shelter, but this brings in the modern societal desire for 'more' than just needs. How many people just work to afford to live, and why is that often so expensive... typically because others somewhere, indirectly, are making more than they need to live. Landlords, businesses, etc. Profit and 'growth' all break the basic concept of bartering to live; they take more than they give, in the name of status and power. I don't think we can go back to a simpler approach, but at the same time I don't belive copyright is fit for purpose even in the simplest forms any more. What people are willing to pay for seems to have become confused in the modern day compared to what they 'need' to live.