5 ms·
It's even harder than harvesting lightnings.
by cm2187 3y ago
It's even harder than harvesting lightnings.
- sandworm101 3y agoI'm not sure about that. Drill some holes, pump some water, and geothermal power straight to the grid can be done. Harvesting lighting would require innumerable towers and even would require some trickery to get it hooked up to our power grids.
- borgunit2 3y agoThat’s not kinetic earthquake energy, though. I think in an apples-to-apples comparison, you would need to attach some kind of device to absorb the kinetic energy from the fault.
- rzzzt 3y agoA building-sized piezo crystal?
- lawlessone 3y agoCountry sized.
- squirtle24 3y agoOr one clock tower and a flux capacitor...
- cm2187 3y ago...and wait for the next major earthquake to even test it.
- barbariangrunge 3y agoA friend, back when he was a physics student, looked into harvesting lightning. He calculated that it wasn't economically viable: tons of wattage, but for such brief timespans, that it doesn't actually amount to that much on a comparative scale. The cost of building the collectors and transporting the electricity (from ocean platforms) was much higher than the cost of using other energy sources. Iirc. It wasn't exactly a serious investigation by a team of engineers, but I basically trust his conclusion. Maybe it will be more attractive in the future after we stop using hydrocarbons?
- kulahan 3y agoI know embarrassingly little about electricity, but wouldn't this also likely require significant advances in semiconductors to even be feasible?
- manarth 3y agoFor starters, the scythe keeps melting