3 ms·
> Since health recommendations are generalized for an entire population, it makes sense that experts target individual advice with the public in mind. I profou
by raxxorraxor 3y ago
> Since health recommendations are generalized for an entire population, it makes sense that experts target individual advice with the public in mind.
I profoundly disagree here. I believe it would and should undermine trust in scientific publications if the results get framed with the intend to influence behavior. That is neither scientific nor helpful. Perhaps a statement would need to make sure it cannot be generalized as is.
You can say that nuts are healthy for the most part, it won't immediately kill the people with allergies and you could also replicate the numbers game that was put forward as a justification to lie.
Perhaps the result of a study needs to be put in context, if it is not "communicable" as is.
But this is such an easy example to communicating the results that there shouldn't even be a thought wasted for the "correct" framing of a study.
- didgeoridoo 3y agoIt gets even worse when policy-level thinking gets incorporated — something like, “eating red meat causes climate change; climate change hurts people; therefore we declare that eating red meat hurts people.” The most obvious recent example of this was the health establishment supporting mass gatherings during the George Floyd protests, because of the argument that fighting racial inequities was even more critical to public health than stopping the spread of COVID. Trust in public health institutions has been consequently gutted, and I don’t see it coming back any time soon.