> Most of that can be (and a lot of it was) resolved with artificial voices Existing artificial voices don't even attempt to tackle many of the points and are

> Most of that can be (and a lot of it was) resolved with artificial voices Existing artificial voices don't even attempt to tackle many of the points and are very clearly a poor substitute (watching a movie dubbed by Alexa?) even in the scenarios where they could be used - far from "resolved". If taking a binary view that it's already technically possible and therefore isn't relevant, I could claim the same of scams. Given you initially claimed "no positive" but here only take issue to "most" applications listed, do you admit that there are some positives - even if you believe them to be outweighed by negatives? > certainly no need to make it widely accessible If it exists but isn't widely accessible, it's likely in the hands of Musk/Zuck and or various state actors. To me that seems the worst alternative - to have a public generally unaware that it's possible and receiving few of the benefits listed, yet still having it available as a tool for competent disinformation.