3 ms·
My objection isn't that the impact of banning electronics during takeoff and landing is unknowable; that's not the main issue with banning car radios, cars, or
by jefftk 3y ago
My objection isn't that the impact of banning electronics during takeoff and landing is unknowable; that's not the main issue with banning car radios, cars, or bare faces either. Instead it's that the impact is too small to be worth the cost.
- spanktheuser 3y agoI think its fair to say I misread the thrust of your argument. I still come down on the other side; I am comfortable enforcing a widespread deprivation of a convenience in order to further reduce the risk of a rare but catastrophic outcome.
- mh- 3y agoRealize that if you make commercial air travel sufficiently (further) unpleasant, many of those people will choose to drive to their destinations instead. This will cause a net increase in deaths because, mile-for-mile, driving is orders of magnitude more deadly than flying commercial.
- lupusreal 3y agoBanning car stereos would be a good idea. Besides distracting drivers, listening to music also helps people push past their normal fatigue limit and drive for much longer than they should. Driving tired is about as dangerous as driving drunk.