Your article does not fully support the claim. > Whether or not the dogs were "incorrect" was a definitional question for Dr Malins. The dog was accurate, how

Your article does not fully support the claim. > Whether or not the dogs were "incorrect" was a definitional question for Dr Malins. The dog was accurate, however the dogs definition of accurate (there is some minimal smell) vs. the enforment officers (i need some smell so i have a ground for search) vs. the people (i walked through a cloud of smell) might be very different, which makes the measure "accurate" - well - very inaccurate.