I don't think it's misleading, and the responses of exactly how much code you can get away with is IMO missing the point. The point is not about the total stac

I don't think it's misleading, and the responses of exactly how much code you can get away with is IMO missing the point. The point is not about the total stack size or anything of the sort, it's that they didn't require much new stuff to be built. They're tools that can answer questions, role play, translate, write code and more and the architecture isn't a huge new system. It's not "First we do this, then we encode like this, then we perform a graph search, then we rank, then we decide which subsystem to start, then we start the custom planner, then a custom iteration over..." It's not a large, unique thing only one group knows how to make. > Otherwise you could also say it's 10 lines of fastAI/lightning style code where almost everything is hidden by the APIs. Sure!