"We actually have a cure for blood cancer now, by the way. Like, we’ve done it." Proceeds to link to a highly experimental and complicated treatment that was o

"We actually have a cure for blood cancer now, by the way. Like, we’ve done it." Proceeds to link to a highly experimental and complicated treatment that was only tested in vitro and in mice. Yes, it is plausible that it could work in humans, but further clinical trials are absolutely needed. I don't trust the author's judgment if he can look at something like that and label what he sees "we have a cure for blood cancer now". If the author is so incapable of seeing and understanding finer details, I am not suprised by the angry and frustrated tone of his article. Yeah, there is a lot of inefficiencies in current systems, often result of lobbying of special interest groups. No doubt about that. But a hypothetical author's autocracy would likely look much worse. For a smart person, he is way too gung-ho about what needs to be done.