3 ms·
Most of that can be (and a lot of it was) resolved with artificial voices. There's no need for voice cloning, and certainly no need to make it widely accessible
by tgv 3y ago
Most of that can be (and a lot of it was) resolved with artificial voices. There's no need for voice cloning, and certainly no need to make it widely accessible.
- Ukv 3y ago> Most of that can be (and a lot of it was) resolved with artificial voices Existing artificial voices don't even attempt to tackle many of the points and are very clearly a poor substitute (watching a movie dubbed by Alexa?) even in the scenarios where they could be used - far from "resolved". If taking a binary view that it's already technically possible and therefore isn't relevant, I could claim the same of scams. Given you initially claimed "no positive" but here only take issue to "most" applications listed, do you admit that there are some positives - even if you believe them to be outweighed by negatives? > certainly no need to make it widely accessible If it exists but isn't widely accessible, it's likely in the hands of Musk/Zuck and or various state actors. To me that seems the worst alternative - to have a public generally unaware that it's possible and receiving few of the benefits listed, yet still having it available as a tool for competent disinformation.