3 ms·
It was for the mammoths.
by rocketbop 3y ago
It was for the mammoths.
- bawolff 3y agoAnd for the people who liked to eat mammoths More to the point, the word "tragedy" in context isn't saying that the end result is neccesarily a tragedy for the people involved. The "tragedy" is our (alleged) inability to have nice shared stable resources, not any specific outcome of any specific resource being exhausted.
- oh_sigh 3y agoSure - my point was that maybe mammoths weren't viewed as nice shared stable resources, but rather like cruel giants that might destroy your settlement, crops, and family randomly for fun. Sort of like how how elephants are viewed by rural farmer folk in many parts of Africa.