3 ms·
Like sokoloff pointed out, I think you are missing my point. I'm arguing that precisely because "senior" implies age-related status, I think many people are usi
by galaktor 14y ago
Like sokoloff pointed out, I think you are missing my point. I'm arguing that precisely because "senior" implies age-related status, I think many people are using it wrongly. And therefor applying time-related measurements where they are actually looking for expertise.
If by "senior" you are referring to somebody who's been in the industry or on a project for a long time, I would agree.
However I do not agree that that person will automatically make a good teacher, team-lead, consultant, mentor simply because he/she has been around for a while.
Unfortunately I see exactly that happening time and again, and blogs discussing how "senior" they are based on how good they know JavaScript. Hence my post.
Sorry if I was not clear enough in the article, I'd appreciate any suggestions on how to improve it so that it makes the point better.
- DrJokepu 14y agoI agree with the rest of your post, I'm just nitpicking here. I wanted to point out that when a professional is described as senior, it has nothing to do with age or how long they've been in the industry, it reflects their status. Assuming a somewhat meritocratic environment, I think "senior" means the same as "expert".