3 ms·
there's two independent statements: - i am authorized by the owner of this piece of copyrighted work - this copyrighted work appears at this url. the first n
by notatoad 3y ago
there's two independent statements:
- i am authorized by the owner of this piece of copyrighted work
- this copyrighted work appears at this url.
the first needs to be true under penalty of perjury. the second can be as false as you want with no repercussions.
- Aerroon 3y agoBut what is "this piece of copyrighted work"? If they're filing a DMCA claim then it indicates that (a part of) the video they're filing a claim against is "this copyrighted work".
- notatoad 3y agoYou don't file a dmca takedown against a video, you file against a URL. All you're claiming is that your copyrighted content is somewhere in that url. But even if you were filing against a video directly, it doesn't mean you're claiming ownership of the video. It could just be one song on the soundtrack, Or a still photo shown without authorization, Or one of the actor's tattoos (seriously) that is the subject of your claim.