> Courts nationally are grappling with the rapid rise of generative artificial intelligence programs like OpenAI's ChatGPT and how to regulate their use in cour

> Courts nationally are grappling with the rapid rise of generative artificial intelligence programs like OpenAI's ChatGPT and how to regulate their use in court proceedings. I don’t think you really need to try to regulate ChatGPT. You just keep the status quo where the lawyer submitting is responsible for everything, and they get sanctioned and maybe lose their license if they submit bs to the court. Treat it as a tool that the person using is responsible for. EDIT: Lawyers are a regulated group, so the numbers involved are tractable. The punishment also has teeth since you need a law license to practice law. We don’t explicitly regulate hammer use, but make the user of the hammer responsible for how they used it and what they did with it.