2 ms·

I actually work with LLMs extensively, and have been for several years now. I suspect domain adaptation could help here, but I am convinced that the issue I exp

I actually work with LLMs extensively, and have been for several years now. I suspect domain adaptation could help here, but I am convinced that the issue I experienced is a more fundamental limitation: I don’t think this technology is inherently suited to the task of innovative logical analysis over novel issues. The same problem can be observed with programming tasks: LLMs can crank out accurate code to solve common problems, but they fail at truly original tasks. I suspect interpolation in the latent space just isn’t sufficient to do the job.

ProllyInfamous 3y ago
My absolute agreement (with Roberts) is that legal research will be forever-changed. Most of the "innovative logical analysis over novel issues" that I have personally witnessed/directed/felt... has to do with comparing dead/living authors' POVs, between their fictional universes. Of course, this is a reflection of humanity, having elsewhere made such comparisons... but the ability to harness the patterns/connnections of just SO MANY unique POVs — is absolutely BEYOND HUMAN. -- Thanks for your informative perspective, and for sharing =D