By the commonly held definition of open, in the context of "open source", it is not open. > You can view, use and modify the code to your hearts content. The

By the commonly held definition of open, in the context of "open source", it is not open. > You can view, use and modify the code to your hearts content. The non-commercial clause of their license specifically prohibits commercial use, so we cannot use this source, and presumably the data that the source uses, to our hearts content. The OSI has a definition of open source that clearly states commercial use is required [0]. Wikipedias entry on Open Source Licensing also stipulates that commercial re-use is required [1]. There is a term called "source available" which is more in line with your intent. [0] https://opensource.org/osd/ https://opensource.org/osd/ [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open-source_license https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open-source_license