Has a thought today about where you're right on this. Where is the value and why does it still not feel right for me. Walls work both ways of course. So for th

Has a thought today about where you're right on this. Where is the value and why does it still not feel right for me. Walls work both ways of course. So for the inhabitants of a walled world an element of seclusion and protection is offered if they've insecure needs. Indeed there are many network security companies providing just this model. Where I feel friction with this is in the latitude between benevolent and malevolent protection, as in "protection racket"... to cultivate dependency. And that there's a difference between operating "in the world", and operating in special, decoupled version of your own reality isolated from everyone else which is fragmentary. So my objection comes from there, if that makes sense? I just don't think it's good for the world if we live in bubbles, some degree of mutual exposure is healthy for society if not for business,