Absolutely. Many sibling comments point out all the ways this is true - that this massive sample (and it is truly big-data) is still a tiny speck of the human c

Absolutely. Many sibling comments point out all the ways this is true - that this massive sample (and it is truly big-data) is still a tiny speck of the human condition and spectrum of thought and experience. It raises vital questions about the where the centroid of this cloud of random stuff that people decided to input into the machine really lies? What is not represented in the model? Probably just about everything! Big new questions about objectivity and normalcy occur. Is the average of everybody elses' intelligence actually any use at all to an average individual? Does the average of everybody elses' intelligence have a different kind of use to groups, companies, states, than common utility of synthesising though-like speech?