3 ms·
Initially you're right. At the crucial point they did however convince the miners to support a Segwit + blocksize increase, which pulled away the support. Of
by lawn 3y ago
Initially you're right.
At the crucial point they did however convince the miners to support a Segwit + blocksize increase, which pulled away the support.
Of course, it's obvious that it was just a bait-and-switch and the blocksize increase is nowhere to be seen, and will probably never happen.
- ETH_start 3y agoThey were able to execute the SegWit2x bait and switch, and shenanigans before it, only after the forums had already been censored and they could promote UASF as a threat against the miners. Ultimately, miners would only support a hard fork if a super majority went along with it and with the major forums being censored that was going to be impossible. Without the censorship there would have been a super majority supporting the hard work given the sentiment on the forums at that time.