4 ms·

Mullvad VPN location set to Frankfurt germany Using the us east test server: Proxy Score: 10/100 - Very likely not a Proxy VPN Score: 0/55 - Very likely not

Mullvad VPN location set to Frankfurt germany Using the us east test server: Proxy Score: 10/100 - Very likely not a Proxy VPN Score: 0/55 - Very likely not a VPN Using german test server: Proxy Score: 10/100 - Very likely not a Proxy VPN Score: 30/55 - Very likely a VPN The thing that changed between both tests was the flow latencies vs ping latencies check. Clicking on more info it said: "flow variance too large in relation to avg flow: 0.6937484181219945" I guess it works kinda, but not very consistent. But e.g. https://ipinfo.io/ https://ipinfo.io/ reveals immediately that this IP is a VPN IP address.

WelcomeShorty 3y ago
Cloudflare's Warp: Proxy Score: 55/100 - Very likely a Proxy VPN Score: 15/55 - Could be a VPN (But Unlikely) Client Score: no client threat And ipinfo gives me: privacy: Object, vpn: false, proxy: false, tor: false, relay: false, hosting: true, service: "",
reincoder 3y ago
I work for IPinfo and I am glad to see privacy detection working. Internally, one thing we sometimes discuss is whether we should use "scores" when it comes to IPs. Personally, I think there is a market for indicating whether an IP is good or bad and giving it a reputation score. However, as a company, we prefer not to do that and there is a good reason for it. There are two core caveats: 1. Ambiguity: Scores can often be ambiguous when determining whether an IP is an "anonymous IP". Having a boolean response for VPN, proxy, or Tor is a simpler solution and we prefer simplicity. 2. Accuracy: We prioritize accuracy and strive for complete coverage. Some "ip reputation" providers essentially just repackage threat feeds. We want to avoid getting involved for now. Our policy is to be reliable and allow our customers to sell IP reputation and cybersecurity solutions using our data. If they wish to create reputation scores using our data, they are more than welcome to do so.

WelcomeShorty 3y ago

Cloudflare's Warp: Proxy Score: 55/100 - Very likely a Proxy VPN Score: 15/55 - Could be a VPN (But Unlikely) Client Score: no client threat And ipinfo gives me: privacy: Object, vpn: false, proxy: false, tor: false, relay: false, hosting: true, service: "",

reincoder 3y ago

I work for IPinfo and I am glad to see privacy detection working. Internally, one thing we sometimes discuss is whether we should use "scores" when it comes to IPs. Personally, I think there is a market for indicating whether an IP is good or bad and giving it a reputation score. However, as a company, we prefer not to do that and there is a good reason for it. There are two core caveats: 1. Ambiguity: Scores can often be ambiguous when determining whether an IP is an "anonymous IP". Having a boolean response for VPN, proxy, or Tor is a simpler solution and we prefer simplicity. 2. Accuracy: We prioritize accuracy and strive for complete coverage. Some "ip reputation" providers essentially just repackage threat feeds. We want to avoid getting involved for now. Our policy is to be reliable and allow our customers to sell IP reputation and cybersecurity solutions using our data. If they wish to create reputation scores using our data, they are more than welcome to do so.