2 ms·
>Personally I never found AMD is that efficient at idle. Since we're talking about Japan, Intel is affectionately called the IdleM@ster as a pun on the very po
by Dalewyn 3y ago
>Personally I never found AMD is that efficient at idle.
Since we're talking about Japan, Intel is affectionately called the IdleM@ster as a pun on the very popular IdolM@ster franchise.
https://twitter.com/neko1942/status/1261661579101143040 https://twitter.com/neko1942/status/1261661579101143040
https://twitter.com/Fact_M_Q/status/1325604249623953408 https://twitter.com/Fact_M_Q/status/1325604249623953408
- paulmd 3y agothat's hilarious, thanks but yeah, it's true, the paradox of intel is that they can get it so wrong in the big picture and execution and integration but sometimes the little details are so right. I225V is a mess. Sapphire Rapids has 700W transients above average. But idle power and interactive scenarios on client processors is a dream. They still tend to be better than AMD on their driver side and general platform validation and stability (as much as that has been a doubtful thing and continues to be going forward, it's true).