4 ms·
Add this point from the article for context: "This retraction is Tessier-Lavigne’s fourth in as many months, a stunning turn of events for a researcher of his s
by korginator 3y ago
Add this point from the article for context: "This retraction is Tessier-Lavigne’s fourth in as many months, a stunning turn of events for a researcher of his stature."
That begs the question, how did at least four such cutting-edge research works with fabricated data and results go through the review process unscathed?
- ekianjo 3y agoYou just discovered that the peer review process is a big farce. Well done.
- wolverine876 3y agoThere's no evidence of fabricated data, afaik. (That's your own fabrication, apparently.)
- bryan0 3y agoHere’s some of the evidence of data manipulation: https://stanforddaily.com/2022/11/29/stanford-presidents-research-under-investigation-for-scientific-misconduct-university-admits-mistakes/ https://stanforddaily.com/2022/11/29/stanford-presidents-res...
- wolverine876 3y agoThanks. Clearly there are (or were at the time of the article) serious allegations that it is a possibility.