4 ms·
Everyone's needs are different, but over time with the loss of a couple of disks, I started to hate running RAID5 or 6 with HDDs. It became an exercise in how f
by mattbillenstein 3y ago
Everyone's needs are different, but over time with the loss of a couple of disks, I started to hate running RAID5 or 6 with HDDs. It became an exercise in how fast could I replace a disk before the next one died and would the rebuild actually work or not - although, it always did. Also, the hot-swap case/cage I had with all the SATA connectors and power connectors seemed kinda flaky - it was very cheap.
So a couple years ago, I downsized to a single 2TB SSD in a smallish ATX case - and another in a completely different machine that gets rsync'd every 4 hours. My nas is now just my last desktop's hardware with two SSDs - one boot, one larger storage running plex, smbd, backups of misc stuff on cron, duplicity backup to the cloud, etc on Ubuntu. If I didn't have this extra hardware, I'd probably just run two medium powered NUCs with a nvme boot disk and a bigger SSD for storage.
It's all very very simple and I have it setup so I can run some LXC containers should I want to do some dev work there, but I usually have other hardware for that anyway.
- at_a_remove 3y agoI am imagining a NAS appliance designed for high availability and low-touch, like a RAID 10 box with a ton of hot spares, designed to automatically rebuild in case of failure. The hot spares are spun up once a month to prevent stiction.
- nine_k 3y agoGood thing that 2TB suffices for you! I think RAID NAS boxes seem to make sense at sizes several times this.
- CPLX 3y agoI have done a bunch of stuff in the past but most recently I just bought two synology arrays and followed the instructions to set them up in less than an hour and they just worked with literally zero hassle.