2 ms·
This isn't true. I can think of many examples off the top of my head. Tax brackets, accredited investors, professional regulation, varying classes of driver
by Teever 3y ago
This isn't true.
I can think of many examples off the top of my head.
Tax brackets, accredited investors, professional regulation, varying classes of drivers licenses, voting ages, retirement age and pension eligibility... the list goes on and on.
- Nevermark 3y agoYou are right. The entire basis of those laws is the two classes. I was referring to laws (such as copyright) that don't have an inherent class distinction dimension. Since separating classes is not a primary concern of copyright, having two classes creates an arbitrary line which will almost certainly end up where the rich want it.
- Teever 3y ago> Since separating classes is not a primary concern of copyright, This is also incorrect as copyright is intrinsically about creating two classes of people -- those who own the copyright and those who don't.