5 ms·

> More, smaller letters packed into a smaller space doesn't mean more information What smaller space are you talking about? The browser window dimensions don't

> More, smaller letters packed into a smaller space doesn't mean more information What smaller space are you talking about? The browser window dimensions don't change. On vanilla HN at the default zoom level, I can see ~22 submissions. Whereas with the posted site, I can only see ~9. How is that not less information density?

krapp 3y ago
Again, and for the last time because I know it's going to be pointless, because people here have some weird hostility towards proper typography and design - information is a property of language and information density is a separate property from the density of the text itself. That you see fewer items per line and fewer lines in your monitor does not mean there is less information on the page. It's same information, it's just spread out more. If you switched to a larger monitor, the information density would not magically increase. If you switched to a smaller monitor, it would not decrease. The information density remains the same regardless of the layout, because it's coming from HN's API and the same data sources that populate HN's own page.
- et-al 3y ago
  > It's same information, it's just spread out more. Maybe I'm being dense, but isn't density mass per volume, or more specifically here: headline per screen area? So spreading out information would make it less dense.
- lopkeny12ko 3y ago
  > weird hostility towards proper typography and design...It's same information, it's just spread out more. This sounds like some kind of delusion web designers tell themselves to justify pushing out UI changes that users don't want. "It's the same information but just more spread out" is quite literally the definition of reduced information density.
- hn_throwaway_99 3y ago
  You're trying to make pointless semantic distinctions, so I'll put it bluntly: I think a screen where I can see a lot less info all on the screen at once, and where I need to scroll and scroll to see more info, is less efficient and useful to me than one where I can see more on-screen at once. You can make all the arguments you want about what "semantic density" really means, but I don't care. The other site is objectively worse for me, and many others, so we don't need to be lectured to about what "proper design" is. If you like it better, congrats, knock yourself out.
- stonogo 3y ago
  The "weird hostility" probably has more to do with your opinions being presented as "proper typography and design" followed by frankly incoherent arguments wherein you try to tell people their preferences are incorrectly stated.
- MrVandemar 3y ago
  I studied design. I know what an en-dash is, and an em-dash, and I know when to use them. I know about reading gravity, and page furniture and leading and kerning and ligatures and all that stuff. I love that stuff. But in the end "Proper typography" is just a set of general guidelines. They are not unbreakable rules; nor are they applicable to every audience in every situation. In fact, one design rule that I remember is to "understand your audience". I think the audience for Hacker News generally prizes economy, efficiency, time and information density; wants to see more LOC on screen not less, and probably a reasonable percentage spend their day looking at screens like this: https://miro.medium.com/v2/resize:fit:1400/0*cZ0wb7K2E6qtZttQ.jpg https://miro.medium.com/v2/resize:fit:1400/0*cZ0wb7K2E6qtZtt... (This is an exaggeration, but exaggerations are useful for understanding sometimes). It's less a wierd hostility to proper typography, and more an understandable hostility to affecting what is comfortable and efficient; lastly don't underestimate the power of an idiosyncratic design: it has character, it is recognisable, and it stands out.

krapp 3y ago

Again, and for the last time because I know it's going to be pointless, because people here have some weird hostility towards proper typography and design - information is a property of language and information density is a separate property from the density of the text itself. That you see fewer items per line and fewer lines in your monitor does not mean there is less information on the page. It's same information, it's just spread out more. If you switched to a larger monitor, the information density would not magically increase. If you switched to a smaller monitor, it would not decrease. The information density remains the same regardless of the layout, because it's coming from HN's API and the same data sources that populate HN's own page.

et-al 3y ago
> It's same information, it's just spread out more. Maybe I'm being dense, but isn't density mass per volume, or more specifically here: headline per screen area? So spreading out information would make it less dense.
lopkeny12ko 3y ago
> weird hostility towards proper typography and design...It's same information, it's just spread out more. This sounds like some kind of delusion web designers tell themselves to justify pushing out UI changes that users don't want. "It's the same information but just more spread out" is quite literally the definition of reduced information density.
hn_throwaway_99 3y ago
You're trying to make pointless semantic distinctions, so I'll put it bluntly: I think a screen where I can see a lot less info all on the screen at once, and where I need to scroll and scroll to see more info, is less efficient and useful to me than one where I can see more on-screen at once. You can make all the arguments you want about what "semantic density" really means, but I don't care. The other site is objectively worse for me, and many others, so we don't need to be lectured to about what "proper design" is. If you like it better, congrats, knock yourself out.
stonogo 3y ago
The "weird hostility" probably has more to do with your opinions being presented as "proper typography and design" followed by frankly incoherent arguments wherein you try to tell people their preferences are incorrectly stated.
MrVandemar 3y ago
I studied design. I know what an en-dash is, and an em-dash, and I know when to use them. I know about reading gravity, and page furniture and leading and kerning and ligatures and all that stuff. I love that stuff. But in the end "Proper typography" is just a set of general guidelines. They are not unbreakable rules; nor are they applicable to every audience in every situation. In fact, one design rule that I remember is to "understand your audience". I think the audience for Hacker News generally prizes economy, efficiency, time and information density; wants to see more LOC on screen not less, and probably a reasonable percentage spend their day looking at screens like this: https://miro.medium.com/v2/resize:fit:1400/0*cZ0wb7K2E6qtZttQ.jpg https://miro.medium.com/v2/resize:fit:1400/0*cZ0wb7K2E6qtZtt... (This is an exaggeration, but exaggerations are useful for understanding sometimes). It's less a wierd hostility to proper typography, and more an understandable hostility to affecting what is comfortable and efficient; lastly don't underestimate the power of an idiosyncratic design: it has character, it is recognisable, and it stands out.