FF objected because they didn't want to do the work, but they're now doing that work making proper tail calls work in WASM, so their objection is irrelevant now

FF objected because they didn't want to do the work, but they're now doing that work making proper tail calls work in WASM, so their objection is irrelevant now. MS objected that Windows APIs made PTC slow, but they now use Chrome, so they don't have an excuse today either. There's nothing inherently insecure about proper tail calls and that is pure FUD. That just leaves Google. They chose to die on the hill of syntactic tail calls and are still refusing to implement the spec. The only reason left is their pride and emotional investment in STC. Even back then, Safari was implementing and had more marketshare than Edge and FF combined (now 2.5x their combined market share with FF only having around 3% share today). I'm tired of bad excuses and want them to actually implement the now 8 year old spec properly.