>> A lot of low-code solutions seem to hit about 80% of a company’s requirement. The 80% is not evenly distributed. Marketing might have problems that are 95%

>> A lot of low-code solutions seem to hit about 80% of a company’s requirement. The 80% is not evenly distributed. Marketing might have problems that are 95% satisfied by low-code and they can change their process for the last 5%, or accounting can do 100% of a 50% subset of their job with low-code. Logistics can't really do any of their job so they steer clear. All the other points are related to trying to satisfy 100% of a custom problem with a generic low code framework. Don't do that. You run into all of these problems with custom code solutions too; The debate should be about investment vs. control, of which no/low/custom coding is a component but not the differentiator as presented here.