> “Twitter’s offer to pay him a bonus in return became a binding contract under California law,” US District Judge Vince Chhabria said in a ruling Friday. In a

> “Twitter’s offer to pay him a bonus in return became a binding contract under California law,” US District Judge Vince Chhabria said in a ruling Friday. In another article, it is said that the promise was an oral promise. [1] > The company argued that an oral promise was not a contract and that Texas law should apply, but the judge found that California law governed the case. But, the judge wrote, “Twitter’s contrary arguments all fail.” https://www.nytimes.com/2023/12/24/business/twitter-x-employee-bonuses-lawsuit.html https://www.nytimes.com/2023/12/24/business/twitter-x-employ...