3 ms·
IIRC when China developed the first one, it was a game-changer in the western Pacific. Until then, US carriers and other ships could safely go where they wanted
by wolverine876 3y ago
IIRC when China developed the first one, it was a game-changer in the western Pacific. Until then, US carriers and other ships could safely go where they wanted, including within range of Taiwan in case of a war. The US Navy had sufficient defenses against 'cruise' anti-ship missiles (that fly parallel to the ground, like planes).
But ballistic missiles are much harder to intercept (and I think have much greater range) and China was able to put the carriers, then the core of US naval power, at risk. Submarines also help, and the US is now shifting away from dependence on its carriers.
I'm surprised the Houthis have them, or even Iran. I thought it was still only a capability of a few countries.
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]
- AnimalMuppet 3y agoIf I understand correctly, China has a much harder problem than the Houthis. Knowing where a carrier is that is 200 miles behind Taiwan, so 300 miles off the coast of China, knowing the location accurately enough to give targeting information to a missile... that's a hard problem. Knowing where a ship is in a straight that's 30 miles wide? That's a lot easier. So I suspect that the Houthis can't do what the Chinese can.