3 ms·
Would a browser feature that skipped to the relevant parts of the video based on closed captioning and understanding search intent be useful? It seems like thi
by robrenaud 3y ago
Would a browser feature that skipped to the relevant parts of the video based on closed captioning and understanding search intent be useful? It seems like this would be a good way for Google to fight to stay relevant in UX vs having the chat bots just quickly spitting out a readable answer. Hunting through ad laden webpages is annoying. Seeking to the relevant section of the video is a solvable problem, especially for videos above some viewership threshold.
- dcow 3y agoDidn’t Google try this already? It seems useful to me, at least. IMO the next frontier of search is not better hypertext, it’s podcasts, audio, and video.
- nulld3v 3y agoI've definitely seen Google do this already: https://searchengineland.com/google-tests-suggested-clip-search-results-video-jumps-directly-answer-273488 https://searchengineland.com/google-tests-suggested-clip-sea...
- tentacleuno 3y agoGoogle seems to be taking much more advantage of YouTube's transcription feature lately. The first addition was the (ok, gimmicky) animation on the Subscribe button when someone says the dreaded like. Hopefully a sign of things to come. Overall AI summaries are very welcome for a certain subset of YouTube which is sadly dominated by sponsored, clickbait, and ad-driven content.
- tentacleuno 3y ago> Seeking to the relevant section of the video is a solvable problem ...and it has already been solved, though partially: SponsorBlock allows people to add a "Highlight" section to a video, which denotes the part of the video which the user most likely wanted to see (sans the "what's up guys", "like and subscribe", etc.) Of course, it's not perfect: it relies upon humans doing the work, though some may see that as a positive over something more computerized.