If I had a gadget that might steal your life's savings, but assured you the probability was "near-zero", would you be ok with that? Perhaps you personally woul

If I had a gadget that might steal your life's savings, but assured you the probability was "near-zero", would you be ok with that? Perhaps you personally would be fine with it. But would it be ok for a court declaring that someone has no recourse, and must accept such an uncompensated risk?