> When the operator doesn't have full Agency of their hardware, can they be held accountable for it's unexpected behavior? Yes? Because that's what "supervisio

> When the operator doesn't have full Agency of their hardware, can they be held accountable for it's unexpected behavior? Yes? Because that's what "supervision" means? Again, I'm very much not following your logic. The whole idea behind supervised autonomy[1] is that the device may not behave correctly. Period. If you aren't capable of supervising your car after an update you clearly weren't doing any supervision before the update. [1] Or supervised anything! Would you argue against holding parents accountable for childproofing their homes just because their kids got an "update" and learned to walk? Again I really don't think you're thinking this through.