I completely agree. Betamax says that a technology which has significant non-infringing uses is not inherently infringing. We've already got precedent saying

I completely agree. Betamax says that a technology which has significant non-infringing uses is not inherently infringing. We've already got precedent saying that AI generated works don't accrue copyright protection, and by the same argument the act of generation by the AI expresses no intent, so infringement or otherwise must be down to the human using the output because the black box itself has no agency.