4 ms·
> special access for the elite. I think that this is about property rights, the news industry has been gutted in the last 30 years, a lot of content creators (
by sgt101 3y ago
> special access for the elite.
I think that this is about property rights, the news industry has been gutted in the last 30 years, a lot of content creators (journalists) have lost their livings. The ones that are left are going to lose their livings if the content they generate is rendered valueless because there is no way of protecting that value.
In terms of special access, think about your shoes. They are nice, but only you are allowed to use them. This is not fair. You are the elite...
This goes to difficult places.
- davidy123 3y agoI don't think it will be rendered valueless, but it shouldn't be completely exclusive. Basically as an extension of today's search model (which is a large part of what LLMs are, along with a grab-bag of useful ML algorithms), people should be able to access information universally, but if they want to go to perspectives or very fine details, then a pay model is acceptable, as long as there's a trail from freely available information and evaluable models. Ultimately imo there are bigger problems with elite/gatekeepered information than finding new ways to produce or support information development, given the power a few corporations are gaining and the opportunity to overcome stratified society.