> "Generative AI" is obviously copyright infringement You're saying this as a matter of fact when it's not clear at all. We'll see what happens with the NYT ca

> "Generative AI" is obviously copyright infringement You're saying this as a matter of fact when it's not clear at all. We'll see what happens with the NYT case because it touches on all the major points. It's gonna call into question all web scraping and indexing because they're also distillations of copyrighted content in the same manner.