3 ms·

That in no way negates the possible existence of a conspiracy. Officials in the Bahamas may have received bribes and want to cover that up. So the logical ques

That in no way negates the possible existence of a conspiracy. Officials in the Bahamas may have received bribes and want to cover that up. So the logical question now is: why did the Bahamas refuse to grant consent for a trial on those charges?

lern_too_spel 3y ago
The campaign finance charge from the indictment is for directing donations through a third party to hide the source of the contributions. The evidence (Singh's testimony) was already presented in court. https://www.justice.gov/usao-sdny/pr/united-states-attorney-announces-charges-against-ftx-founder-samuel-bankman-fried https://www.justice.gov/usao-sdny/pr/united-states-attorney-...