> You’re saying it’s better to have no high quality media at all than to have any form of DRM? I get your point, but there’s plenty of high quality media produ

> You’re saying it’s better to have no high quality media at all than to have any form of DRM? I get your point, but there’s plenty of high quality media produced without financial incentive or with alternate funding schemes (donations, gov grants, patronage). I think hyperbole weakens the argument here.