3 ms·
Hey so the problem isn't the output of the LLMs but the input - the data they are trained on is stolen (big suprise, you can't claim fair use when using somethi
by dmbche 3y ago
Hey so the problem isn't the output of the LLMs but the input - the data they are trained on is stolen (big suprise, you can't claim fair use when using something commercially, like training your LLM).
The output is irrelevant.
Edit1: If you want to verify this, check out all the lawsuits against AI companies : it's always about using their copywritten goods. Any discussion about the output is to talk about the amount of damage done to the copyright holder, not if damage exists or not.
- kromem 3y agoHere's one of the senior legal peeps at the EFF who has litigated IP cases talking about the issue: https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2023/04/how-we-think-about-copyright-and-ai-art-0 https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2023/04/how-we-think-about-cop... It's not as clear cut as you think it is.