4 ms·
What about comma? https://comma.ai/ https://comma.ai/ Seems like our old friend geohot built exactly what you want. Positive HN discussion: https://news.ycombi
by exhilaration 3y ago
What about comma? https://comma.ai/ https://comma.ai/ Seems like our old friend geohot built exactly what you want.
Positive HN discussion: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36927971 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36927971
- bluescrn 3y agoIf it became popular it'd be regulated out of existence
- rpmisms 3y agoDiesel tuners are still very popular.
- shkkmo 3y agoThat is only a level 2 autonomous driving system, with capabilities on par with many other stock manufacturer driver assistance system. Having an open source alternative is coolsl, but it doesn't really bear on the argument I think is being made. I think the argument is that we won't see the same availability beyond level 3, since level 4 is the first step where a human is not required behind the wheel. This means you probably need subscription to have a remote human who can step in and take control in edge cases, at least until we develop AGI. Even then, I suspect the economics of running a full AGI from each vehicles will make a subscription mandatory.